JurídicoESEN
Order (Auto)August 30, 2005

A- de 2005

The official text of this ruling is in Spanish and is shown as published by the Colombian authorities.

Reporting justice Jaime Córdoba Triviño

✓Claimant Camilo Gutierrez Jaramillo

✓
Topic · hard data
Recurso De Suplica Presentado Contra El Auto Del 15 De Julio De 2005, Proferido Por El Magistrado Manuel Jose Cepeda Espinosa, Que Rechazo La Demanda De Inconstitucionalidad Presentada Por Camilo Gutierrez Jaramillo Contra El Articulo 1 De La Ley 32 De 1985. Revoca El Auto De Rechazo Y Ordena Al Honorable Magistrado Sustanciador Admitir La Demanda
01

Topics and subtopics of the ruling

✓What the ruling decides and analyzes, as indexed by the Court's case-law reporter's office. Each topic links to every decision that addresses it.

Ley Aprobatoria De Tratado Internacional Perfeccionado
  • Línea jurisprudencial sobre competencia de la Corte Constitucional
2 topics · 2 subtopics · source: case-law reporter's topic index
02

What it decided

This decision records no constitutional review holdings. This is common in tutela rulings and orders, where the decision does not concern a legal provision.
·

Operative part (Resuelve)

✓Verbatim text of the decision, as it appears in the ruling. It complements the structured holdings above.

  1. PRIMERO. REVOCAR el auto del 15 de julio de 2005, que rechazo la demanda promovida por el ciudadano Camilo Gutierrez Jaramillo en contra del articulo 1o de la Ley 32 de 1985, "por medio de la cual se aprueba la "Convencion de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados", suscrita en Viena el 23 de mayo de 1969" y el articulo 25 de la Convencion de Viena sobre el Derecho de los Tratados. En su lugar, ORDENAR al Honorable Magistrado Sustanciador admitir la demanda mencionada.
  2. SEGUNDO. Comunicar el contenido de esta decision al recurrente.
Verbatim text · source: operative part of the ruling
03

The bench that decided

We distinguish who appears in the ruling (signature, vote or concurrence) from who probably sat on the Court on that date. The difference is shown by color and shape.

04

How it connects

Each decision is a node in the case-law network: it cites some and is cited by others. Follow the threads.

The document’s networkthe most influential links · node size is how often the Court cites it
constitutional review unification tutela

The indexed topics and subtopics of this decision are above, in Topics and subtopics of the ruling.